In my historical research on the Islamist Entanglement, I have been examining the intellectual undercurrent that runs through Middle Eastern history during the Western Ascendancy of 1683-1839 and subsequent Western Supremacy over the region. It has been a fascinating project, with far greater rewards that I had suspected. Among the most interesting characters I [...]
Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category
Jamal ad-Din Al-Afghani, Is That Your Final Answer?
Posted in History, Philosophy, The Middle East, World History, tagged Al-Afghani, Ayn Rand, Islamist Entanglement, Nietzsche on May 12, 2008 | 2 Comments »
Powell History Quote of the Week
Posted in History, Philosophy on November 12, 2007 | Leave a Comment »
“A man does not attain to the universal by abandoning the particular, nor to the everlasting by an endeavour to overleap the limitations of time and place. The abiding reality exists not somewhere apart in the air, but under certain temporary and local forms of thought, feeling, and endeavour. We come most deeply into communion [...]
Kant vs. Columbus, Part 4
Posted in American History, Columbus, History, Philosophy, World History, tagged Columbus, Immanuel Kant, Objectivism applied to history, the Discovery of America on November 1, 2007 | 2 Comments »
The Discovery of America is not merely the name of an event; it is a historical abstraction.
Like all historical abstractions it has unique characteristics that make it a particular type of cognitive tool, akin to concepts, but distinct.
Historical abstractions–like the Renaissance, the American Revolution, the Civil War–are mental integrations of historical information into a mental [...]
Kant vs. Columbus (Part 3)
Posted in American History, Columbus, History, Philosophy on October 26, 2007 | 1 Comment »
Kant’s philosophical assault on man’s faculty of reason paved the way for the historical assault on Columbus by preventing a key avenue of development from ever occuring in Western historiography. By aborting the general study of abstractions as cognitive tools, Kant prevented historians from adopting the epistemological stance necessary to define and defend the most [...]
Kant vs. Columbus (Part 2)
Posted in Columbus, History, Philosophy on October 22, 2007 | 1 Comment »
In the nineteenth century, historians were desparately in need of a champion to clarify the nature of reason, and to guide them in the challenge of making sense of man’s complex past. Newton’s genius had shown the power of man’s mind to penetrate nature’s inner workings, but no one had been able to articulate [...]
Kant vs. Columbus (Part 1)
Posted in American History, Columbus, History, Philosophy on October 11, 2007 | 2 Comments »
To my knowledge Immanuel Kant never expressed any interest in Christopher Columbus. Certainly he is not known for having done so or considered influential regarding the debate over the question of Columbus’s place in history or the discovery of America. (There was, of course, no debate on this question until the twentieth century.) Nonetheless, it is Kant [...]
